Benchmark software interview stages against the market

To benchmark your software interview stages, compare the number of rounds, the time between them and the demands you place on applicants against what engineering talent now expects, then cut any stage that doesn't clearly help you make a decision.
Author

Wajahat Abbasi

Job Title

Lead Developer

What does engineering hiring look like right now?

The market has shifted towards the people you want to hire. Rise Technical's 2025/26 Insights Report, surveying over 500 employers and 1,000 candidates found that 79% of UK technical professionals plan to change employers in 2026. That means most of the engineers you interview are open to moving, but they also have options and little patience for a slow, confusing process.

Demand for skills makes this sharper. The Institution of Engineering and Technology reported in 2025 that 76% of engineering employers struggle to recruit for key roles, with technical and specialist sustainability skills topping the list. When good software engineers are this hard to find, every extra interview stage is a chance for a strong applicant to accept an offer somewhere else.

Why do software interview stages drift out of line with the market?

Most interview processes grow by accident. A team adds a stage after one bad hire, keeps it forever, and nobody asks whether it still earns its place. Over time you end up with a phone screen, a take-home task, a live coding round, a system design round and a panel, each run by different people testing overlapping things.

The dynamics work against you here. With 79% of UK technical professionals planning to move in 2026, according to Rise Technical's 2025/26 Insights Report, the engineers worth hiring are usually interviewing in two or three places at once. A five-stage process spread over three weeks loses to a tighter one almost every time, not because your stages are bad, but because someone else closed first.

How do you benchmark your interview stages against the market?

Start by mapping every stage you run, who owns it, what it actually tests and how long it adds to the clock. Then score each stage against three questions: does it predict on-the-job performance, does it duplicate another stage, and does it respect the applicant's time? Any stage that fails two of the three is a candidate for cutting.

  • Count your stages. Three to four focused rounds is a sensible benchmark for most software roles; more than that and you need a clear reason for each.
  • Measure the gaps, not just the stages. Days spent waiting between rounds cost you offers as surely as the rounds themselves.
  • Cap the unpaid work. A take-home task that runs to a full day signals that you value your time more than the applicant's.
  • Test one thing per stage. If two rounds both probe system design, merge them.
  • Give a decision date at the first conversation, and stick to it.

The goal isn't the shortest process. It's the leanest one that still gives you confidence. In a market where 76% of engineering employers struggle to recruit for key roles, per the Institution of Engineering and Technology's 2025 figures, speed and signal matter more than volume of hoops.

How can we help you hire software engineers faster?

Benchmarking your stages only pays off if you can reach the right engineers before your process even starts. Our recruitment agent manages recruitment end to end for 8% on a successful hire, with no monthly fee and no upfront cost, through Reed.ai. If you want a tighter, faster engineering hire, tell us what good looks like and we'll bring you the shortlist.

Sources

Wajahat Abbasi
Share